Why Not Bi review

76.0
40%

- Published on April 20th, 2022

- Last update on April 20, 2022

- Main niches: Bisexual

If you’re looking for varied, high production quality bisexual content, I’m sure that you’ll find it at Why Not Bi. Here you can expect scripted MMF threesomes, sometimes with fauxcest, or Tgirls, and even the occasional foursome to make that variety even more complete. Plus, occasionally pegging, or alternating between lovers – and it’s all well-filmed, with beautiful stars to enjoy as well. Really, I found little-to-nothing to be concerned about on the soft side of details for this site, and I’m quite serious when I say that I think it shows. However, that’s far from everything. Jump into the library details with me – let’s see if Why Not Bi can continue it’s trend.

Variable Updates, Full HD Streams, Not Quite A Hundred Videos

As of the time of writing for this review, Why Not Bi has certainly fallen behind some. What used to be a rather reliable update schedule has become variable, and as a result the collection has only grown to 92+ individual videos, each with an associated gallery. These videos can only be streamed, with an average run-time of 20 minutes each, and are available in up to Full HD resolution. That’s unfortunately a step behind modern 4K as I’m sure you know. The galleries average 25 lower-resolution shots, and are not available in Zip archives.

Good Features, Mobile-Responsive Site, Confusing Model Index

Let’s start with the bad here, shall we? There is indeed a model index implemented on Why Not Bi, but it isn’t particularly useful unless you upgrade your membership. That’s because it includes the models from the 8 gay sites across the Men.com network – so there’s a lot of extra in there that isn’t included with Why Not Bi. Meanwhile, the site is properly mobile-responsive, and features include tags, a basic search and basic ratings, a playlist, and favorites – plenty to keep it clear and easy to browse around the site as a whole.

Pros

  1. Solid feature set, that definitely helps Why Not Bi stay browsable and easy to use.
  2. Full HD streams to showcase all the variety within the collection – these should load fast.

Cons

  1. No 4K support, no downloads, no reliable update schedule and a resultant smaller library – Why Not Bi certainly has a laundry list of issues.

Content Amount:

  • 92+ Videos/Galleries
  • Updates: Variable

Videos:

  • Video Length: Avg. 20 min
  • Streaming: Full HD 1080p (Flash)

Photos:

  • Resolution: HQ 1200×800 (.jpg)
  • Pics per Set: Avg. 25
  • Zip Files: No

Models:

  • Total: 100+ (U.S. based)
  • Ages: 18-30+
  • Ethnicities: mostly white
  • From semi pros to pornstars

Pricing:

2 Day Trial:
$
1.00
/day
[Rebills at $29.99/mo. until cancelled]
1 Month:
$29.99
$17.99
[Recurs every month at $34.99] 40% OFF
12 Months:
$
8.33
/mo.
[Billed yearly at $99.99]

Beware of pre-checked cross sales.

Ratings
  • Content Amount
  • Quality
  • Updates
  • Usability
  • Download/Streaming
  • Value

Author Rating

76.0

Frankly, I have to start this segment by saying that I’m sure Why Not Bi can do better. If nothing else, a better and firmer update schedule would certainly help this site a lot – but so would the option to download, so would streams in the modern standard resolution of 4K, and so will the effects of a better update schedule – more videos. On the other hand, the content itself, the features, and the site design are all solid. Ultimately, I have to admit that this bisexual hardcore offering lands itself in about the mid-range of ‘good’ porn sites. That’s why I’m awarding Why Not Bi with a score of 76 full points, alongside my recommendation to those bisexual fans wanting to expand an existing collection even further.

YOUR OPINIONS
[Total: 0    Average: 0/5]

Even More Premium Sites

Outside Reviews

Leave Comment

Leave a Reply

clear formSubmit